Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Joe Thomas: an Inhuman Monster. Beer=Spit. Snowflakes. Killll Mee

Political Correctness is a form of brainwashing.

Some guy attacked Joe Thomas for saying "if you violate league rules and go into another teams' stands to celebrate, you should expect beer to get poured on you".

Look, you people: That guy (who was banned from all future Browns games--probably lucky they didn't arrest him) didn't hit anybody with a brick or baseball bat, ok?

And for crying out loud this snowflake writer is saying getting beer poured on you is maybe worse than getting SPIT on!?! OKFG GET A GRIP!!!

Holee crap when I grew up we got in FIGHTS!  We struck eachother with our knuckles and stuff!

What a bunch of fkng sissies!  This is why our (foreign) enemies laugh at us!  Buncha spoiled brats!  Beer=spit just shut tf up snowflake.  And DON'T VOTE.

Ohmmm....ohmmmmmm....

I was gone for awhile but I'm back now.  Joe Thomas you da man.

Greedy Williams will start at CB vs the Jets.  It might help some.  You guys know I like Terrence Mitchell a lot, but Williams has too many physical advantages over Terrence to be held off for very long, plus Williams proved he could tackle (in spades) throughout preseason.

Freddie Kitchens says he thought Eric Kush did a good job at Right Guard vs the Titans.

He means these things, and he is usually correct, so you can stifle the obligitory snark, see?

I mean, if he had said that Hubbard or Robinson or Harris did a good job, you could sneer and snort all you wanted, but he won't offer any such BS.

This (such as it is) is good news, as we were all worried about Kush; indeed wondering how soon one of the two newest guys could replace him, right?

Now we're worried about Robinson and Hubbard again.

Ok but the Browns were "in" the Titans game until Robinson got the boot, Hubbard went to Left Tackle, and Kendall Lamm came in at Right Tackle.

Still with me here? Ok so this blew that "chemistry" the experts talk about so much all to hell.

Vs the Jets, Robinson will be back, and Hubbard will return to RT.  Niether is worth writing home about, I know, but at least the Offensive Line will regain it's cohesiveness and continuity vs the Jets.

It M A T T E R S.

Mayfield looked especially sharp in practice today, and somebody is (rightfully) pointing out how effective the Browns' hurry-up is (mostly because of him).

It would be nice to hurry up all the time, but that's been tried.  The hurry-uppers' defense ends up on the field too much and wearing out.

Sticking with it wouldn't have worked vs the Titans after the Robinson fiasco.  Defenses blitze and stunt more vs hurry-ups, trying to blow stuff up in the backfield, and two new Offensive Tackles are too easy to screw up.

Somebody else broke down the 18 penalties the Browns drew.

Remember what I said about political correctness?

Tom Beilik's whole precedent for his alleged analyisis was that the penalized player was guilty of either poor technique or lack of discipline...the operative word being "guilty".

Tom concedes up front that every call was legitimate.  Obviously, Tom has at least been brainwashed, and might be a pod-person.

A person using an actual brain as intended (especially from Cleveland) would never assume that referees were always right, let alone validate all 18 of those calls.

And yes, Tom did exactly that!  He hinted that somebody might say that a couple of them might not have been absolutely neccessary BULLSHIT.

STOP IT.  T H I N K.  

You kids...those referees unmistakeably screwed the Browns, systematically.  I saw two holding calls that were bullshit (sorry if I hurt your feelings thereπŸ–•), but the players were innocent.  H O L D I N G!!!!

And I can't trust a damn thing Tom wrote here about any of the other penalties.  

He's got Myles Garrett "punching" a guy in the face, and I know for sure that one of those roughing the passer penalties was bullshit:

Tom describes Browns defenders alternately "driving the Quarterback into the turf" and hitting him---nevermind I can't stay with this: Tom is a drone and a snowflake. He should seek his fortune writing speeches for...

Nevermind I'm so disgusted I want to spit nay!  Pour beer on somebody!

Zzingg anyway at least half those flags were bullshit here on this planet and in this dimension here in reality and I'm sick of pod people, drones, and politicians who ohmmm....ohhmmmmm...

But it never stops, ya know?  Your homework assignment is to watch the movie "Idiocracy" (twice), and "1984".

"Idiocracy" was a comedy, but just accidentally became prophetic.  "1984" was written by a former communist as a warning oops sorry sports blog nevermind...

You people...with all due respect to Jake Burns and several others like him, I've been ahead of Mary Kay, Pluto, Grossi etc for awhile now, and some other scumbags read my posts and regurgitate them without attribution ohhmmm....ohmmmmm...

πŸ–•

I keep digressing here, but it bugs me that the majority of my readers are people who systematically steal and regurgitate my thoughts and opinions.

My brother doesn't think he reads this blog, but trust me: he does.  He just reads the regurgitations instead, 18 hours to 3 days later.

And always sanitized, of course.  You know, sans the sarcasm, insults, caustic humor, spice, etc well πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•.  That's for the assholes that steal my intellectual property and for my bros who read those scumbags and not the source of their brilliant insights...

I gotta credit my brother IN LAW here Bub: Bub reads my blog, and I think appreciates the caustic humor and sarcasm and stuff too.  Bub, none of those fingers were aimed at you.  Please resume commenting (I know how to find "feedback" now, and will "hear" you).

When I set this thing up, I wanted to get you and my bros involved.  That's why I gave you the links.

I never wanted to be the Big Expert.  I wanted the 3 of you to give me feedback; I wanted at least a semi-debate, see?

Budd noooo! My bro in law actually gave me feedback.  My genetic bros ignored me.

I can't help but thinking that the 4 of us arguing would have been more successful than this, but thank you Bub for...everything.

Please inform my brothers that they are assholes and resume giving me feedback, and feel free to be less diplomatic.

My original intention was to create a kind of "forum" where the 4 of us discussed and debated all things Browns, but obviously all the invitees except you laughed at the notion.

I know you all have your carreers and lives to live and stuff,  but I didn't think that asking for weekly discussions of the Browns was too much to ask.  Excuse the hell outta ME!

Well obviously my genetic bros find discussing the Browns with me not worth bothering with, but I would cherish your input, ok?

Especially where you disagree with me.  And btw feel free to insult me personally, as this is my forum, and I can return the favor, but you know me better than my twin bro, obviously: I am exactly who you want "in charge".

I've gone off the rails here, but am going to publish this.  People "fishing" around the web might find me not BORING.  Browns fans might...?  My bros might extract their heads.

...the goobers can't respect that little corner for me, and don't think it's worth their time to even "put me in my place" jeez...

Hey you other guys?  You think I'm as dumb as my bros do? Aint this pitiful?

FREDO! They think I'm FREDO!  

They're lucky I can take a punch.






No comments: